Balancing Technical Debt and Business Priorities: A Pragmatic Approach

Every digital organisation wrestles with the same fundamental tension: how do we keep moving fast to meet business needs while managing the long-term health of our technology estate? The answer lies not in choosing one over the other, but in striking a pragmatic, intentional balance between technical debt and business priorities.

It’s easy to characterise technical debt as a cost—an unfortunate by-product of pressure, shortcuts, or legacy systems. But the truth is, not all technical debt is bad. In fact, in the right context, it’s a strategic decision. Like financial debt, it can enable short-term velocity when speed matters most. But left unmanaged, it compounds. And eventually, it becomes a drag on innovation, delivery, and even team morale.

The key is to make technical debt visible, discussable, and negotiable. Here’s how we can lead that conversation.

---

Step 1: Shift the Narrative

The first step is to reframe how we talk about technical debt. Too often, it’s treated as an engineering problem—something for developers to clean up quietly, or worse, something to apologise for. But technical debt is a product and business concern, just as much as it’s a technical one. It affects speed, reliability, scalability, and cost.

By surfacing debt as a form of risk and opportunity, we enable better cross-functional decisions. Should we invest in this feature now, knowing it might slow us down later? Or should we repay some of our “interest” first to move more confidently in the future? These are strategic trade-offs—and they require input from product, engineering, and business leaders alike.

---

Step 2: Make It Visible

You can’t manage what you can’t see. One of the most powerful actions an organisation can take is to instrument and catalogue its technical debt. This doesn’t have to be a heavyweight process. Start by embedding the habit into team rituals:

• Add “tech debt impact” to incident reviews.

• Tag backlog items that involve workarounds or code complexity.

• Track time lost due to poor test coverage, brittle environments, or manual processes.

Over time, patterns will emerge. Are certain parts of the codebase slowing down every sprint? Is a lack of observability increasing recovery times? Are build times creeping up? These signals help turn a vague sense of “we’re moving slower” into actionable evidence.

And when we visualise debt in terms of its impact on flow, quality, or customer outcomes, we make it easier for the wider business to engage and prioritise.

---

Step 3: Create Space for Remediation

Acknowledging technical debt is not enough—we must deliberately make time to address it. But that doesn’t mean halting all delivery work. Pragmatic debt management is about integrating it into the delivery process, not side-lining it.

Here are a few common approaches:

• The 80/20 split: Allocate a fixed percentage of each sprint or increment to engineering health work, like refactoring, reducing build time, or improving test coverage.

• Debt Fridays: Dedicate a day each fortnight for teams to work on high-priority tech debt or enablers.

• Tech debt spikes: Schedule short investigations into high-risk areas to better understand scope and options before committing time to resolution.

• Product-aligned refactors: Pair debt reduction with new features, refactoring as you go to improve the foundation before adding functionality.

The key is to be explicit. Track, plan, and celebrate engineering improvement work the same way you would a new product feature.

---

Step 4: Embed Debt in Decision-Making

Mature organisations treat technical debt as a first-class citizen in product and portfolio decisions. This means:

• Including debt reduction goals in OKRs or team metrics.

• Factoring tech health into delivery estimates and roadmaps.

• Giving teams the autonomy to flag and act on areas of concern.

It also means elevating engineering voices in prioritisation discussions. Engineers are closest to the pain—empower them to surface when speed is being eroded or when the cost of inaction is climbing.

When technical debt becomes part of the strategic conversation—not just an afterthought—we create alignment between what we build and how we build it.

---

Step 5: Lead with Pragmatism

Let’s be clear: we can’t pay down all technical debt. Nor should we try. The aim is not to eliminate it, but to manage it deliberately. That means:

• Accepting some debt when speed-to-market matters most.

• Paying down high-interest areas that are actively harming delivery.

• Investing in enabling infrastructure and engineering practices to prevent future debt.

This is not about perfection—it’s about resilience. By making small, consistent investments in technical health, we reduce future risk and increase our capacity to respond to change.

---

The Strategic Payoff

When we balance technical debt and business priorities well, the results are transformative. We deliver faster with confidence. We empower engineers. We reduce firefighting. And we create a more sustainable, scalable foundation for innovation.

As digital engineering leaders, our role is to bring clarity and context to the debt conversation—to help our organisations move beyond the false choice between now and later, and instead build systems that support both.

Because when we manage technical debt with intent, we don’t just build better code—we build a better future.