• Home
  • BVSSH
  • Engineering Enablement
  • Playbooks
  • Frameworks
  • Good Reads
Search

What are you looking for?

Standard : Teams frame and plan work around outcomes, not outputs

Purpose and Strategic Importance

This standard ensures teams plan and execute work based on measurable outcomes rather than just outputs-focusing on the real impact achieved. It aligns efforts with meaningful goals, driving more informed decisions and reducing wasted effort.

Aligned to our "Outcome-Driven Development" policy, this standard keeps teams laser-focused on delivering tangible, trackable value. Without it, work drifts toward checking boxes instead of creating true impact.

Strategic Impact

Clearly defined impacts of meeting this standard include improved delivery flow, reduced risk, higher system resilience, and better alignment to business needs. Over time, teams will see reduced rework, faster time to value, and stronger system integrity.

Risks of Not Having This Standard

  • Reduced ability to respond to change or failure
  • Accumulation of technical debt or friction
  • Poor developer experience and morale
  • Decreased confidence in releases and features
  • Misalignment between technical implementation and business priorities

CMMI Maturity Model

  • Level 1 – Initial: Teams focus on features and delivery, with no link to impact.

  • Level 2 – Managed: Some initiatives are outcome-linked, but most are task-based.

  • Level 3 – Defined: Work is framed around measurable outcomes and aligned to business goals.

  • Level 4 – Quantitatively Managed: Outcome success is measured and reviewed across initiatives.

  • Level 5 – Optimising: Outcome framing drives planning, learning, and investment at every level.


Key Measures

  • Adoption metrics relevant to the standard (to be defined)
  • Quality, throughput, and system health metrics aligned to capability
  • Maturity scores based on structured assessment
Associated Policies
  • Outcome-Driven Development
Associated Practices
  • CQRS (Command Query Responsibility Segregation)
  • Evolutionary Architecture
  • InnerSource Development
  • Working Agreements
  • Chaos Engineering
  • Customer Feedback in Dev Loops
  • Ensemble Testing
  • Non-functional Requirement Testing
  • Async Collaboration Norms
  • Sprint Demos for Stakeholders

Technical debt is like junk food - easy now, painful later.

Awesome Blogs
  • LinkedIn Engineering
  • Github Engineering
  • Uber Engineering
  • Code as Craft
  • Medium.engineering