• Home
  • BVSSH
  • Engineering Enablement
  • Playbooks
  • Frameworks
  • Good Reads
Search

What are you looking for?

Standard : Data confidence levels are visible and understood at decision time

Purpose and Strategic Importance

This standard ensures that confidence levels in data are clearly visible and well-understood at the point of decision-making. It enables teams to make faster, safer, and more informed choices by surfacing data reliability alongside the data itself.

Aligned to our "Data-Driven Decision-Making" policy, this standard strengthens trust in systems, reduces rework caused by poor-quality data, and supports a more transparent, accountable engineering culture.

Strategic Impact

  • Improved consistency and quality across teams
  • Reduced operational friction and delivery risks
  • Stronger ownership and autonomy in technical decision-making
  • More inclusive and sustainable engineering culture

Risks of Not Having This Standard

  • Slower time-to-value and increased rework
  • Accumulation of inconsistency and process debt
  • Reduced trust in engineering data, systems, or ownership
  • Loss of agility in the face of change or failure

CMMI Maturity Model

  • Level 1 – Initial: Data is used in decision-making without clear indication of its quality or reliability. Confidence levels are assumed or ignored.

  • Level 2 – Managed: Some teams annotate data with basic quality indicators, but practices are inconsistent and often manual. Confidence is discussed but not formalised.

  • Level 3 – Defined: Confidence levels are consistently defined, documented, and presented alongside data. Teams are trained to interpret and act on data reliability during decision-making.

  • Level 4 – Quantitatively Managed: Data confidence is measured using defined criteria (e.g., freshness, completeness, accuracy). Dashboards and decision-support tools display confidence levels clearly at the point of use.

  • Level 5 – Optimising: Confidence insights influence data architecture, pipeline prioritisation, and governance. Teams continuously refine how data quality is surfaced and factored into strategic and operational decisions.


Key Measures

  • Adoption rates and coverage across teams
  • Impact on delivery metrics, quality, or team health
  • Evidence of ownership, governance, or learning loops
Associated Policies
  • Data-Driven Decision-Making
  • Decentralised Decision-Making
Associated Practices
  • Software Composition Analysis (SCA)
  • Chaos Engineering
  • Exploratory Testing
  • Hypothesis-Driven Development
Associated Measures
  • Feature Usage Rate
  • ROI of Engineering Investments

Technical debt is like junk food - easy now, painful later.

Awesome Blogs
  • LinkedIn Engineering
  • Github Engineering
  • Uber Engineering
  • Code as Craft
  • Medium.engineering